<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Techniques for unique, correct and fast geo-queries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friism.com/techniques-for-unique-correct-and-fast-geo-queries/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friism.com/techniques-for-unique-correct-and-fast-geo-queries</link>
	<description>a Michael Friis production</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:59:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: friism</title>
		<link>http://friism.com/techniques-for-unique-correct-and-fast-geo-queries/comment-page-1#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator>friism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itu.dk/~friism/blog/?p=121#comment-1105</guid>
		<description>@Kasper: It&#039;s not a bad bet, but user defined functions cannot call routines that alter state, and rand() counts as a state-altering routine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kasper: It&#8217;s not a bad bet, but user defined functions cannot call routines that alter state, and rand() counts as a state-altering routine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kasper Videbæk</title>
		<link>http://friism.com/techniques-for-unique-correct-and-fast-geo-queries/comment-page-1#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Kasper Videbæk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 10:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itu.dk/~friism/blog/?p=121#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>&quot;Had there been a rand(intid) aggregate, the problem would have been solved.&quot;

Maybe you could make an &quot;aggregate&quot; UDF, using this technique: http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/jeffs/articles/1490.aspx

Don&#039;t know if it&#039;d be what you call an elegant solution, though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Had there been a rand(intid) aggregate, the problem would have been solved.&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe you could make an &#8220;aggregate&#8221; UDF, using this technique: <a href="http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/jeffs/articles/1490.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/jeffs/articles/1490.aspx</a></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;d be what you call an elegant solution, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
